Ryzen Threadripper 9960X vs Xeon 6517P
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X outperforms Xeon 6517P by an impressive 87% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 190 | 38 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 39.70 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 6.28 | 6.38 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | no data | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| Release date | 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 30 July 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,499 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon 6517P and Ryzen Threadripper 9960X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 72 MB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 4x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 79 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 33,260 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 6517P and Ryzen Threadripper 9960X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA4710 | sTR5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 190 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6517P and Ryzen Threadripper 9960X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon 6517P and Ryzen Threadripper 9960X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| SGX | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6517P and Ryzen Threadripper 9960X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6517P and Ryzen Threadripper 9960X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5(6400MT/s) | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6517P and Ryzen Threadripper 9960X.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 88 | 80 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 28.21 | 52.84 |
| Recency | 1 January 2025 | 30 July 2025 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 24 |
| Threads | 32 | 48 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 190 Watt | 350 Watt |
Xeon 6517P has 84.2% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X, on the other hand, has a 87.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 6517P in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon 6517P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
