Pentium G2130 vs Xeon 6517P
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 6517P outperforms Pentium G2130 by a whopping 2450% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 218 | 2660 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 24.52 | 0.07 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 6.23 | 0.84 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Granite Rapids (2024−2026) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 24 February 2025 (1 year ago) | 21 January 2013 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,195 | $90 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon 6517P has 34929% better value for money than Pentium G2130.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon 6517P and Pentium G2130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 72 MB (shared) | 3072 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 3 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | no data | 94 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 79 °C | 65 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 6517P and Pentium G2130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA4710 | FCLGA1155 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 190 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6517P and Pentium G2130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| My WiFi | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon 6517P and Pentium G2130 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6517P and Pentium G2130 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6517P and Pentium G2130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5(6400MT/s) | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TB | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | 8 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.05 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon 6517P and Pentium G2130 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6517P and Pentium G2130.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 88 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 28.05 | 1.10 |
| Recency | 24 February 2025 | 21 January 2013 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 190 Watt | 55 Watt |
Xeon 6517P has a 2450% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.
Pentium G2130, on the other hand, has 245% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon 6517P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium G2130 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon 6517P is a server/workstation processor while Pentium G2130 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
