A9-9430 SoC vs Xeon 6517P
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 195 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 6.31 | no data |
Designer | Intel | AMD |
Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
Architecture codename | no data | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
Release date | 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 31 May 2016 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 6517P and A9-9430 SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 32 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 160 KB |
L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 72 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | Intel 3 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 79 °C | no data |
64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 6517P and A9-9430 SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA4710 | FT4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 190 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6517P and A9-9430 SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon 6517P and A9-9430 SoC technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
SGX | + | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6517P and A9-9430 SoC are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6517P and A9-9430 SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR5(6400MT/s) | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 4 TB | no data |
Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon R5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6517P and A9-9430 SoC.
PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 88 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 January 2025 | 31 May 2016 |
Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
Threads | 32 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 190 Watt | 25 Watt |
Xeon 6517P has an age advantage of 8 years, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.
A9-9430 SoC, on the other hand, has 660% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon 6517P and AMD A9-9430 SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 6517P is a server/workstation processor while A9-9430 SoC is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.