Processor N250 vs Xeon 6353P
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 6353P outperforms Processor N250 by a whopping 397% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 421 | 1671 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 100.00 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 25.45 | 55.50 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Twin Lake (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago) | 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $426 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon 6353P and Processor N250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 257 mm2 | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 6353P and Processor N250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1700 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6353P and Processor N250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon 6353P and Processor N250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6353P and Processor N250 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6353P and Processor N250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel UHD Graphics 730 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6353P and Processor N250.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.24 | 3.47 |
| Recency | 24 February 2025 | 7 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
Xeon 6353P has a 396.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Processor N250, on the other hand, has 983.3% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon 6353P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor N250 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon 6353P is a server/workstation processor while Processor N250 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
