7 230H vs Xeon 634

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 634
2026, $499
12 cores / 24 threads, 150 Watt
21.96
+53.2%

Xeon 634 outperforms Core 7 230H by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking361673
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.68no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Raptor Lake-H
Power efficiency6.06no data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameGranite Rapids (2024−2026)Raptor Lake-H (2023−2026)
Release date2 February 2026 (less than a year ago)12 June 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Xeon 634 and Core 7 230H: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Performance-cores12no data
Threads2416
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
L1 cache112 KB (per core)864 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)9.5 MB
L3 cache48 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nm10 nm
Die size598 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)68 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 634 and Core 7 230H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA4710BGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 634 and Core 7 230H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon 634 and Core 7 230H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 634 and Core 7 230H are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 634 and Core 7 230H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5(6400MT/s)no data
Maximum memory size2 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 634 and Core 7 230H.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes80no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 634 21.96
+53.2%
7 230H 14.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 634 37589
+53.2%
Samples: 2
7 230H 24533
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.96 14.33
Recency 2 February 2026 12 June 2026
Physical cores 12 10
Threads 24 16

Xeon 634 has a 53% higher aggregate performance score, and 20% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

7 230H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.

The Intel Xeon 634 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 7 230H in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 634 is a server/workstation processor while Core 7 230H is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 178 votes

Rate Xeon 634 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 7 230H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 634 and Core 7 230H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.