Ryzen 7 253 vs Xeon 6315P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 6315P
2025, $213
4 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
6.94

Ryzen 7 253 outperforms Xeon 6315P by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1335799
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.45no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Power efficiency5.21no data
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-R (2023−2026)Hawk Point-H (Zen 4) (2024−2026)
Release date24 February 2025 (1 year ago)2 June 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$213no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Xeon 6315P and Ryzen 7 253: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-cores4no data
Threads416
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rate16 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size163 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 6315P and Ryzen 7 253 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1700FP7r2/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6315P and Ryzen 7 253. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2USB 4, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon 6315P and Ryzen 7 253 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6315P and Ryzen 7 253 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6315P and Ryzen 7 253. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2500 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6315P and Ryzen 7 253.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 6315P 6.94
Ryzen 7 253 12.60
+81.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 6315P 11883
Samples: 8
Ryzen 7 253 21553
+81.4%
Samples: 12

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.94 12.60
Recency 24 February 2025 2 June 2026
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16

Ryzen 7 253 has a 82% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The AMD Ryzen 7 253 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 6315P in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 6315P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 253 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 327 votes

Rate Xeon 6315P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 7 253 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 6315P and Ryzen 7 253, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.