Xeon Gold 6240 vs 5160

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 5160
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 80 Watt
0.61
Xeon Gold 6240
2019
18 cores / 36 threads, 150 Watt
15.28
+2405%

Xeon Gold 6240 outperforms Xeon 5160 by a whopping 2405% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5160 and Xeon Gold 6240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2803458
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.158.87
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency0.729.63
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$22$2,445

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6240 has 313% better value for money than Xeon 5160.

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5160 and Xeon Gold 6240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads236
Base clock speed3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache0 KB1.125 MB
L2 cache4 MB18 MB
L3 cache0 KB24.75 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature65 °C85 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage rangeB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5160 and Xeon Gold 6240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14 (Multiprocessor)
SocketLGA771FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5160 and Xeon Gold 6240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon 5160 and Xeon Gold 6240 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5160 and Xeon Gold 6240 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5160 and Xeon Gold 6240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5160 and Xeon Gold 6240.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon 5160 0.61
Xeon Gold 6240 15.28
+2405%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon 5160 963
Xeon Gold 6240 24270
+2420%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 15.28
Physical cores 2 18
Threads 2 36
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 150 Watt

Xeon 5160 has 87.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6240, on the other hand, has a 2404.9% higher aggregate performance score, 800% more physical cores and 1700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6240 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5160 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5160 and Xeon Gold 6240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5160
Xeon 5160
Intel Xeon Gold 6240
Xeon Gold 6240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate Xeon 5160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 10 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5160 or Xeon Gold 6240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.