Pentium D 960 vs Xeon 5160

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 5160
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 80 Watt
0.61
+19.6%
Pentium D 960
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 130 Watt
0.51

Xeon 5160 outperforms Pentium D 960 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5160 and Pentium D 960 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28032886
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.15no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.720.37
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Presler (2005−2007)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)23 April 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$22$523

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 5160 and Pentium D 960 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5160 and Pentium D 960 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache0 KB16 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB2 MB (per die)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data2x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistorsno data376 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5V1.2V-1.3375V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5160 and Pentium D 960 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA771LGA775,PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5160 and Pentium D 960. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bit32 Bit
FSB parity+-

Security technologies

Xeon 5160 and Pentium D 960 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5160 and Pentium D 960 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5160 and Pentium D 960. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon 5160 0.61
+19.6%
Pentium D 960 0.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon 5160 963
+19.3%
Pentium D 960 807

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 0.51
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon 5160 has a 19.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 62.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon 5160 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium D 960 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 5160 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium D 960 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5160 and Pentium D 960, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5160
Xeon 5160
Intel Pentium D 960
Pentium D 960

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate Xeon 5160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 46 votes

Rate Pentium D 960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5160 or Pentium D 960, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.