Xeon Platinum 8380H vs 5148
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3047 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.05 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.55 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Woodcrest (2006) | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | June 2006 (19 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $9 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon 5148 and Xeon Platinum 8380H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 0 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 38.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 5148 and Xeon Platinum 8380H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 8 |
| Socket | 771 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 250 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5148 and Xeon Platinum 8380H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon 5148 and Xeon Platinum 8380H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5148 and Xeon Platinum 8380H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5148 and Xeon Platinum 8380H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4 RDIMM |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1.12 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5148 and Xeon Platinum 8380H.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 28 |
| Threads | 2 | 56 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 250 Watt |
Xeon 5148 has 525% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8380H, on the other hand, has 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon 5148 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8380H. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
