EPYC 9135 vs Xeon 5140

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 5140
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.49
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
32.72
+6578%

EPYC 9135 outperforms Xeon 5140 by a whopping 6578% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3129142
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.2730.38
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency0.326.96
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Turin (2024)
Release dateJune 2006 (19 years ago)10 October 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$15$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9135 has 611% better value for money than Xeon 5140.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5140 and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed2.33 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed2.33 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache0 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data2x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage rangeB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5140 and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA771SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5140 and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon 5140 and EPYC 9135 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5140 and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5140 and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5140 and EPYC 9135.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 5140 0.49
EPYC 9135 32.72
+6578%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 5140 857
Samples: 24
EPYC 9135 57808
+6645%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.49 32.72
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 200 Watt

Xeon 5140 has 207.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has a 6577.6% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 5140 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5140
Xeon 5140
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon 5140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 5140 and EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.