EPYC 7543P vs Xeon 5140

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 5140
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.54
EPYC 7543P
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 225 Watt
42.14
+7704%

EPYC 7543P outperforms Xeon 5140 by a whopping 7704% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5140 and EPYC 7543P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking283556
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.2712.57
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.7817.65
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Milan (2021−2023)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$15$2,730

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7543P has 194% better value for money than Xeon 5140.

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5140 and EPYC 7543P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed2.33 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.33 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data28
L1 cache0 KB2 MB
L2 cache4 MB16 MB
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage rangeB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5140 and EPYC 7543P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA771SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5140 and EPYC 7543P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon 5140 and EPYC 7543P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5140 and EPYC 7543P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5140 and EPYC 7543P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5140 and EPYC 7543P.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon 5140 0.54
EPYC 7543P 42.14
+7704%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon 5140 857
EPYC 7543P 66687
+7681%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 42.14
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 225 Watt

Xeon 5140 has 246.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7543P, on the other hand, has a 7703.7% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7543P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5140 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5140 and EPYC 7543P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5140
Xeon 5140
AMD EPYC 7543P
EPYC 7543P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon 5140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 17 votes

Rate EPYC 7543P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5140 or EPYC 7543P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.