Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Xeon 5130

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 5130
2006, $16
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.42
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
3.87
+821%

Ryzen Embedded V1605B outperforms Xeon 5130 by a whopping 821% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32521650
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.74no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Embedded
Power efficiency0.2710.90
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Zen (2017−2020)
Release dateJune 2006 (19 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$16no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5130 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache0 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data210 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeB2=1V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5130 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket771FP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5130 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon 5130 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5130 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5130 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 5130 0.42
Ryzen Embedded V1605B 3.87
+821%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 5130 734
Samples: 39
Ryzen Embedded V1605B 6771
+822%
Samples: 116

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 3.87
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen Embedded V1605B has a 821.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 5130 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 5130 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Embedded V1605B is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5130
Xeon 5130
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate Xeon 5130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 34 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded V1605B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 5130 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.