EPYC 9845 vs Xeon 5130

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 5130
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.50
EPYC 9845
2024
160 cores / 320 threads, 390 Watt
87.23
+17346%

EPYC 9845 outperforms Xeon 5130 by a whopping 17346% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5130 and EPYC 9845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29073
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.740.56
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency0.7321.34
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Turin (2024)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$16$13,564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 5130 has 32% better value for money than EPYC 9845.

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5130 and EPYC 9845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)160
Threads2320
Base clock speed2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache0 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB320 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage rangeB2=1V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5130 and EPYC 9845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket771SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt390 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5130 and EPYC 9845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon 5130 and EPYC 9845 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5130 and EPYC 9845 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5130 and EPYC 9845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5130 and EPYC 9845.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon 5130 0.50
EPYC 9845 87.23
+17346%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon 5130 795
EPYC 9845 139712
+17474%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 87.23
Physical cores 2 160
Threads 2 320
Chip lithography 65 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 390 Watt

Xeon 5130 has 500% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9845, on the other hand, has a 17346% higher aggregate performance score, 7900% more physical cores and 15900% more threads, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9845 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5130 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5130 and EPYC 9845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5130
Xeon 5130
AMD EPYC 9845
EPYC 9845

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate Xeon 5130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5130 or EPYC 9845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.