Atom Z3740 vs Xeon 5130

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 5130
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.50
+28.2%
Atom Z3740
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.39

Xeon 5130 outperforms Atom Z3740 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5130 and Atom Z3740 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28933021
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.74no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency0.7318.44
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)27 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$16$32

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5130 and Atom Z3740 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.86 GHz
L1 cache0 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature65 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeB2=1V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5130 and Atom Z3740 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket771UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5130 and Atom Z3740. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon 5130 and Atom Z3740 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5130 and Atom Z3740 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5130 and Atom Z3740. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.1 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon 5130 0.50
+28.2%
Atom Z3740 0.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon 5130 795
+28%
Atom Z3740 621

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 0.39
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 2 Watt

Xeon 5130 has a 28.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom Z3740, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 3150% lower power consumption.

The Xeon 5130 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3740 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 5130 is a server/workstation processor while Atom Z3740 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5130 and Atom Z3740, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5130
Xeon 5130
Intel Atom Z3740
Atom Z3740

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate Xeon 5130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 41 vote

Rate Atom Z3740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5130 or Atom Z3740, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.