Ultra 9 295HX vs Xeon 5040
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Dempsey (2006) | Arrow Lake-HX (2025−2026) |
| Release date | May 2006 (20 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Xeon 5040 and Core Ultra 9 295HX: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2.83 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 1.075V-1.35V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 5040 and Core Ultra 9 295HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | PLGA771 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5040 and Core Ultra 9 295HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon 5040 and Core Ultra 9 295HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5040 and Core Ultra 9 295HX are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5040 and Core Ultra 9 295HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 24 |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 55 Watt |
Ultra 9 295HX has 1100% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and 73% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon 5040 and Intel Core Ultra 9 295HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 5040 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 295HX is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
