Sempron 2400+ vs Xeon 5030

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5030 and Sempron 2400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated3348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data0.20
Architecture codenameDempsey (2006)Barton (2001−2004)
Release dateMay 2006 (18 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$27

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5030 and Sempron 2400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz1.67 GHz
L1 cache0 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data101 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data63 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.075V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5030 and Sempron 2400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPLGA771A
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5030 and Sempron 2400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon 5030 and Sempron 2400+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5030 and Sempron 2400+ are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5030 and Sempron 2400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 62 Watt

Xeon 5030 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Sempron 2400+, on the other hand, has 53.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon 5030 and Sempron 2400+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon 5030 is a server/workstation processor while Sempron 2400+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5030 and Sempron 2400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5030
Xeon 5030
AMD Sempron 2400+
Sempron 2400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate Xeon 5030 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 12 votes

Rate Sempron 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5030 or Sempron 2400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.