EPYC 7371 vs Xeon 3.6
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 433 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 4.13 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 4.28 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Irwindale (2004) | Naples (2017−2018) |
| Release date | June 2004 (21 years ago) | 16 November 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,550 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon 3.6 and EPYC 7371 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 31 |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 169 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 178 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 3.6 and EPYC 7371 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | 604 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 3.6 and EPYC 7371. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 3.6 and EPYC 7371 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 3.6 and EPYC 7371. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 170.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 3.6 and EPYC 7371.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 16 |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 170 Watt |
Xeon 3.6 has 25.9% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7371, on the other hand, has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon 3.6 and AMD EPYC 7371. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
