Ultra 7 265 vs Xeon 3.4

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 3.4 and Core Ultra 7 265 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameIrwindale (2004)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release dateJune 2004 (20 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Xeon 3.4 and Core Ultra 7 265 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads120
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cache16 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm3 nm
Die size169 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors178 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 3.4 and Core Ultra 7 265 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket6041851
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 3.4 and Core Ultra 7 265. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+

Security technologies

Xeon 3.4 and Core Ultra 7 265 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 3.4 and Core Ultra 7 265 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 3.4 and Core Ultra 7 265. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 3.4 and Core Ultra 7 265.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 20
Threads 1 20
Chip lithography 90 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 65 Watt

Ultra 7 265 has 1900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, a 2900% more advanced lithography process, and 107.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon 3.4 and Core Ultra 7 265. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon 3.4 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 3.4 and Core Ultra 7 265, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 3.4
Xeon 3.4
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Core Ultra 7 265

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 7 votes

Rate Xeon 3.4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 3.4 or Core Ultra 7 265, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.