EPYC 7413 vs Xeon 2.8
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 207 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 12.99 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 6.78 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Paxville (2002−2005) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | September 2002 (23 years ago) | 15 March 2021 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,825 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon 2.8 and EPYC 7413 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.65 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 26.5 |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Die size | 217 mm2 | 4x 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 200 million | 16,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 2.8 and EPYC 7413 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | 604 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 2.8 and EPYC 7413. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 2.8 and EPYC 7413 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 2.8 and EPYC 7413. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.795 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 2.8 and EPYC 7413.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 24 |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 180 Watt |
Xeon 2.8 has 33% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7413, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 1757% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon 2.8 and AMD EPYC 7413. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
