Xeon Bronze 3106 vs VIA Nano U2250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

VIA Nano U2250
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 1 Watt
0.10
Xeon Bronze 3106
2017, $306
8 cores / 8 threads, 85 Watt
3.26
+3160%

Xeon Bronze 3106 outperforms Nano U2250 by a whopping 3160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking36511749
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.53
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesVIA NanoIntel Xeon Bronze
Power efficiencyno data4.11
DesignerVIAIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameIsaiah (2009)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date1 January 2009 (16 years ago)11 July 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$306

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

VIA Nano U2250 and Xeon Bronze 3106 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speedno data1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
Multiplierno data17
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data11 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data77 °C
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on VIA Nano U2250 and Xeon Bronze 3106 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketNanoBGA2FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)1 MB85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano U2250 and Xeon Bronze 3106. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

VIA Nano U2250 and Xeon Bronze 3106 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano U2250 and Xeon Bronze 3106 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano U2250 and Xeon Bronze 3106. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2133
Maximum memory sizeno data768 GB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data102.403 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA Nano U2250 and Xeon Bronze 3106.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

VIA Nano U2250 0.10
Xeon Bronze 3106 3.26
+3160%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

VIA Nano U2250 179
Samples: 2
Xeon Bronze 3106 5753
+3114%
Samples: 17

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.10 3.26
Recency 1 January 2009 11 July 2017
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 1 Watt 85 Watt

VIA Nano U2250 has 8400% lower power consumption.

Xeon Bronze 3106, on the other hand, has a 3160% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Bronze 3106 is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Nano U2250 in performance tests.

Be aware that VIA Nano U2250 is a notebook processor while Xeon Bronze 3106 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


VIA Nano U2250
Nano U2250
Intel Xeon Bronze 3106
Xeon Bronze 3106

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 23 votes

Rate VIA Nano U2250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 7 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3106 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors VIA Nano U2250 and Xeon Bronze 3106, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.