Processor N200 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 28 Watt
0.42

Processor N200 outperforms Nano QuadCore L4700 by a whopping 233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32042394
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.64
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesVIAIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency1.61no data
DesignerVIAIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameCNQ (2011)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date12 May 2011 (14 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.2 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.47 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm10 nm
Die size2x 66 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketVIA nanoBGA2Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt + 6 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Processor N200.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 0.42
Processor N200 1.40
+233%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 1615
Processor N200 3902
+142%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 1.40
Recency 12 May 2011 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm

Processor N200 has a 233.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Processor N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Nano QuadCore L4700
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 176 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Processor N200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.