Celeron 1005M vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron 1005M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2672
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesVIAIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameCNQ (2011)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date17 May 2011 (13 years ago)1 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron 1005M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHz5 GT/s
L1 cache512 KB128 KB
L2 cache4 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography40 nm22 nm
Die size132 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron 1005M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAFCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)27.5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron 1005M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron 1005M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron 1005M are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron 1005M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron 1005M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron 1005M.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 May 2011 1 July 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 40 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 35 Watt

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 29.6% lower power consumption.

Celeron 1005M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 81.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron 1005M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Celeron 1005M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Nano QuadCore L4700
Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 238 votes

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 or Celeron 1005M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.