VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 vs VIA C7-M C7-M-1600
General info
Comparing VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | C7-M | C3-M |
Architecture codename | Esther | Nehemiah |
Release date | no data | no data |
Current price | $350 | no data |
Technical specs
VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
Bus support | 400 MHz | 200 MHz |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
64 bit support | - | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 18 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 outperforms VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 by 42% in wPrime 32.
Advantages and disadvantages
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 18 Watt |
We couldn't decide between VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.