Performance per price, higher is better.
AMD EPYC 9654 vs VIA C7-M C7-M-1600
General info
Comparing VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 4 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | no data | 11.94 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | C7-M | AMD EPYC |
Architecture codename | Esther | Genoa |
Release date | no data | 10 November 2022 (1 year old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $11,805 |
Current price | $350 | $3975 (0.3x MSRP) |
Technical specs
VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 96 |
Threads | 1 | 192 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Bus support | 400 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 384 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
Die size | no data | 12x 72 mm2 |
Number of transistors | no data | 78,840 million |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
Socket | no data | SP5 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 360 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | no data | + |
AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TiB |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 460.8 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and EPYC 9654.
PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Advantages and disadvantages
Physical cores | 1 | 96 |
Threads | 1 | 192 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 360 Watt |
We couldn't decide between VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and EPYC 9654. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.