Athlon XP-M 2500+ vs VIA C7-M C7-M-1500 ULV
Primary details
Comparing VIA C7-M C7-M-1500 ULV and Athlon XP-M 2500+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | C7-M | no data |
| Architecture codename | Esther | Barton (2001−2004) |
| Release date | no data | January 2001 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
VIA C7-M C7-M-1500 ULV and Athlon XP-M 2500+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 101 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 63 million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on VIA C7-M C7-M-1500 ULV and Athlon XP-M 2500+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 45 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 45 Watt |
VIA C7-M C7-M-1500 ULV has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 542.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between VIA C7-M C7-M-1500 ULV and Athlon XP-M 2500+. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA C7-M C7-M-1500 ULV and Athlon XP-M 2500+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
