Celeron 2.60 vs V-Series V160
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 3701 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD V-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.05 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| Release date | 1 December 2010 (15 years ago) | June 2003 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
V-Series V160 and Celeron 2.60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3200 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 128 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 146 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 55 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on V-Series V160 and Celeron 2.60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | S1 | 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 73 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V160 and Celeron 2.60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V160 and Celeron 2.60 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V160 and Celeron 2.60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 73 Watt |
V-Series V160 has a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 192% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD V-Series V160 and Intel Celeron 2.60. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that V-Series V160 is a notebook processor while Celeron 2.60 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
