Microsoft SQ1 vs UHD Graphics 630
Primary details
Comparing UHD Graphics 630 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1471 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel UHD Graphics | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
| Architecture codename | Gen9.5 | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) |
| Release date | no data | 2 October 2019 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
UHD Graphics 630 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | 0.35 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm | 7 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by UHD Graphics 630 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Qualcomm Adreno 685 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Microsoft SQ1 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and Microsoft SQ1. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between UHD Graphics 630 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
