N200 vs U300

VS

Aggregate performance score

U300
2023
6 threads, 55 Watt
5.21
+62.8%

U300 outperforms N200 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing U300 and N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11981613
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency8.9650.47
Release date1 January 2023 (1 year ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

U300 and N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Threads64
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.7 GHz
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on U300 and N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1744FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by U300 and N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shift++
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
GPIOno data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

U300 and N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by U300 and N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by U300 and N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size96 GB16 GB
Max memory channels21

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics for 13th Gen Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz750 MHz
Execution Units4832

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of U300 and N200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by U300 and N200 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by U300 and N200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.112.1
OpenGL4.64.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by U300 and N200.

PCI Express lanes209
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

U300 5.21
+62.8%
N200 3.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

U300 8271
+62.8%
N200 5081

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.21 3.20
Threads 6 4
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 6 Watt

U300 has a 62.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more threads.

N200, on the other hand, has 816.7% lower power consumption.

The U300 is our recommended choice as it beats the N200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between U300 and N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel U300
U300
Intel N200
N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate U300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 37 votes

Rate N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about U300 or N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.