Xeon Gold 6430 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.47
Xeon Gold 6430
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 270 Watt
32.03
+6715%

Xeon Gold 6430 outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 by a whopping 6715% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3107164
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.45
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series2x AMD Turion Ultrano data
Power efficiency0.524.59
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenamePuma (2008−2009)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date4 June 2008 (17 years ago)10 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,138

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Xeon Gold 6430 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB60 MB
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Xeon Gold 6430 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketS1g2FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Xeon Gold 6430. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Xeon Gold 6430 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Xeon Gold 6430 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Xeon Gold 6430. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5-4400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Xeon Gold 6430.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 0.47
Xeon Gold 6430 32.03
+6715%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 207
Xeon Gold 6430 1417
+585%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 417
Xeon Gold 6430 11212
+2589%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 32.03
Recency 4 June 2008 10 January 2023
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 270 Watt

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 has 671.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6430, on the other hand, has a 6714.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6430 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6430 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Intel Xeon Gold 6430
Xeon Gold 6430

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 37 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Xeon Gold 6430, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.