Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 by a whopping 3423% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3207 | 523 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.72 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion Ultra | Intel Xeon E5 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 11.23 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Puma (2008−2009) | Broadwell-EP (2016) |
| Release date | 4 June 2008 (17 years ago) | 25 October 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $4,938 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 22 (Docosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 44 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | QPI |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | 2 × 9.6 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 24 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 5.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 55 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 456.12 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 7200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | S1g2 | FCLGA2011 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 MB | 145 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Xeon E5-2699A v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 46 Bit |
Security technologies
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Xeon E5-2699A v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1.5 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 76.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Xeon E5-2699A v4.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 40 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.43 | 15.15 |
| Recency | 4 June 2008 | 25 October 2016 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 22 |
| Threads | 2 | 44 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 145 Watt |
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 has 7150% lower power consumption.
Xeon E5-2699A v4, on the other hand, has a 3423.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 1000% more physical cores and 2100% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2699A v4 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
