Celeron N2830 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.47
+38.2%
Celeron N2830
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.34

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 outperforms Celeron N2830 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Celeron N2830 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29293070
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion UltraIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.274.60
Architecture codenamePuma (2008−2009)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date4 June 2008 (16 years ago)23 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Celeron N2830 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.41 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Celeron N2830 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1g2FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Celeron N2830. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Celeron N2830 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Celeron N2830 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Celeron N2830. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Celeron N2830 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Celeron N2830.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 0.47
+38.2%
Celeron N2830 0.34

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 207
+26.2%
Celeron N2830 164

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 417
+50.5%
Celeron N2830 277

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 1886
+59.2%
Celeron N2830 1185

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 3615
+61.4%
Celeron N2830 2240

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 0.34
Recency 4 June 2008 23 February 2014
Chip lithography 65 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 7 Watt

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 has a 38.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron N2830, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2830 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Celeron N2830, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Intel Celeron N2830
Celeron N2830

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 36 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 240 votes

Rate Celeron N2830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 or Celeron N2830, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.