Ultra 5 245KF vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 32 Watt
0.47
Core Ultra 5 245KF
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.68
+5789%

Core Ultra 5 245KF outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 by a whopping 5789% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Core Ultra 5 245KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2924176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data82.57
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series2x AMD Turion Ultrano data
Power efficiency1.3920.94
Architecture codenamePuma (2008−2009)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Core Ultra 5 245KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Efficient-coresno data8
Threads214
Base clock speedno data4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Core Ultra 5 245KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1g2FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Core Ultra 5 245KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Core Ultra 5 245KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Core Ultra 5 245KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Core Ultra 5 245KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5-6400
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Core Ultra 5 245KF.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 27.68
Recency 3 June 2008 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 2 14
Chip lithography 65 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 125 Watt

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 has 290.6% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 245KF, on the other hand, has a 5789.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 5 245KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 5 245KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Core Ultra 5 245KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
Core Ultra 5 245KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 9 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 or Core Ultra 5 245KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.