Xeon Silver 4210 vs Turion X2 RM-75

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 RM-75
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.38
Xeon Silver 4210
2019, $501
10 cores / 20 threads, 85 Watt
7.76
+1942%

Xeon Silver 4210 outperforms Turion X2 RM-75 by a whopping 1942% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33091136
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.93
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series2x AMD TurionIntel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency0.463.85
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date1 January 2009 (17 years ago)2 April 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$501

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 RM-75 and Xeon Silver 4210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate4000 MHzno data
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache256 KB640 KB
L2 cache1 MB10 MB
L3 cache0 KB13.75 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 RM-75 and Xeon Silver 4210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketS1FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Xeon Silver 4210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Turion X2 RM-75 and Xeon Silver 4210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Xeon Silver 4210 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Xeon Silver 4210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2400
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Xeon Silver 4210.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Turion X2 RM-75 0.38
Xeon Silver 4210 7.76
+1942%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Turion X2 RM-75 670
Xeon Silver 4210 13575
+1926%
Samples: 34

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 7.76
Recency 1 January 2009 2 April 2019
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 85 Watt

Turion X2 RM-75 has 143% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4210, on the other hand, has a 1942% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Silver 4210 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 RM-75 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion X2 RM-75 is a notebook processor while Xeon Silver 4210 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 7 votes

Rate Turion X2 RM-75 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 50 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion X2 RM-75 and Xeon Silver 4210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.