E-300 vs Turion X2 RM-75

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 RM-75
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
+100%

Turion X2 RM-75 outperforms E-300 by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 RM-75 and E-300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29833207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD TurionAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.141.10
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)22 August 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 RM-75 and E-300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rate4000 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm40 nm
Die sizeno data75 mm2
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 RM-75 and E-300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1FT1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and E-300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SVM
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and E-300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and E-300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6310

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion X2 RM-75 0.42
+100%
E-300 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion X2 RM-75 670
+97.1%
E-300 340

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion X2 RM-75 1717
+101%
E-300 853

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion X2 RM-75 3390
+188%
E-300 1176

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion X2 RM-75 38
+108%
E-300 79

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 0.21
Recency 1 January 2009 22 August 2011
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

Turion X2 RM-75 has a 100% higher aggregate performance score.

E-300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 94.4% lower power consumption.

The Turion X2 RM-75 is our recommended choice as it beats the E-300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 RM-75 and E-300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Turion X2 RM-75
Turion X2 RM-75
AMD E-300
E-300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Turion X2 RM-75 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 303 votes

Rate E-300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 RM-75 or E-300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.