Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Turion II Ultra M660

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion II Ultra M660
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.57
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
47.71
+8270%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Turion II Ultra M660 by a whopping 8270% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking302049
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.83
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Turion II UltraAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency0.697.20
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date10 September 2009 (16 years ago)14 July 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Turion II Ultra M660 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
Multiplierno data27
L1 cacheno data4 MB
L2 cache2 MB32 MB
L3 cacheno data256 MB
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data38740 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion II Ultra M660 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-pinsWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Turion II Ultra M660 0.57
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 47.71
+8270%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion II Ultra M660 2278
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 5596
+146%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion II Ultra M660 4403
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 52743
+1098%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 47.71
Recency 10 September 2009 14 July 2020
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 280 Watt

Turion II Ultra M660 has 700% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, on the other hand, has a 8270.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion II Ultra M660 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion II Ultra M660 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II Ultra M660
Turion II Ultra M660
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Turion II Ultra M660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 828 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion II Ultra M660 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.