Performance per price, higher is better.
AMD EPYC 7763 vs Turion II Ultra M660
Combined performance score
EPYC 7763 outperforms Turion II Ultra M660 by 8194% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Turion II Ultra M660 and EPYC 7763 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 2587 | 20 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | no data | 1.19 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | AMD Turion II Ultra | AMD EPYC |
Architecture codename | Caspian (2009) | Milan (2021) |
Release date | 10 September 2009 (14 years old) | 15 March 2021 (3 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $7,890 |
Current price | no data | $13541 (1.7x MSRP) |
Technical specs
Turion II Ultra M660 and EPYC 7763 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 128 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.45 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Bus support | 3600 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 256 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm+ |
Die size | no data | 8x 81 mm2 |
Number of transistors | no data | 33,200 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Turion II Ultra M660 and EPYC 7763 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
Socket | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin | SP3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and EPYC 7763. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Dual-channel 400 MHz DDR2 memory controller, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
AES-NI | no data | + |
AVX | no data | + |
PowerNow | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and EPYC 7763 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and EPYC 7763. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4-3200 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.795 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and EPYC 7763.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 0.67 | 55.57 |
Recency | 10 September 2009 | 15 March 2021 |
Physical cores | 2 | 64 |
Threads | 2 | 128 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 280 Watt |
The EPYC 7763 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II Ultra M660 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion II Ultra M660 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7763 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II Ultra M660 and EPYC 7763, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.