Atom x5-Z8300 vs Turion II Ultra M620
Aggregated performance score
General info
Comparing Turion II Ultra M620 and Atom x5-Z8300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 2719 | 2720 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Turion II Ultra | 5x Intel Atom |
Architecture codename | Caspian (2009) | Cherry Trail (2016) |
Release date | 10 September 2009 (14 years ago) | 2 March 2015 (9 years ago) |
Current price | $19.99 | $197 |
Technical specs
Turion II Ultra M620 and Atom x5-Z8300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1.44 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.84 GHz |
Bus support | 3600 MHz | no data |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Turion II Ultra M620 and Atom x5-Z8300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin | UTFCBGA592 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and Atom x5-Z8300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
AES-NI | no data | + |
PowerNow | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Turion II Ultra M620 and Atom x5-Z8300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
Secure Boot | no data | + |
Identity Protection | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and Atom x5-Z8300 are enumerated here.
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and Atom x5-Z8300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 2 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 12.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics |
Max video memory | no data | 2 GB |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 500 MHz |
Execution Units | no data | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Turion II Ultra M620 and Atom x5-Z8300 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and Atom x5-Z8300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 1920x1080 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and Atom x5-Z8300.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 1 |
USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Turion II Ultra M620 outperforms Atom x5-Z8300 by 125% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Turion II Ultra M620 outperforms Atom x5-Z8300 by 52% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Atom x5-Z8300 outperforms Turion II Ultra M620 by 16% in wPrime 32.
Advantages and disadvantages
Recency | 10 September 2009 | 2 March 2015 |
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
We couldn't decide between Turion II Ultra M620 and Atom x5-Z8300. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II Ultra M620 and Atom x5-Z8300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.