Athlon II X4 615e vs Turion II P540
Aggregate performance score
Athlon II X4 615e outperforms Turion II P540 by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3111 | 2581 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 4.23 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Turion II | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.72 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Propus (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 12 May 2010 (15 years ago) | 21 September 2010 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $59 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Turion II P540 and Athlon II X4 615e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 169 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 300 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion II P540 and Athlon II X4 615e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | S1 (S1g4) | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 MB | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II P540 and Athlon II X4 615e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0 | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II P540 and Athlon II X4 615e are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II P540 and Athlon II X4 615e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II P540 and Athlon II X4 615e.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.52 | 1.14 |
| Recency | 12 May 2010 | 21 September 2010 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 45 Watt |
Turion II P540 has 2150% lower power consumption.
Athlon II X4 615e, on the other hand, has a 119.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
The AMD Athlon II X4 615e is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion II P540 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion II P540 is a notebook processor while Athlon II X4 615e is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
