Xeon w7-2575X vs Turion II Neo K625

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion II Neo K625
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.39
Xeon w7-2575X
2024
22 cores / 44 threads, 250 Watt
38.66
+9813%

Xeon w7-2575X outperforms Turion II Neo K625 by a whopping 9813% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion II Neo K625 and Xeon w7-2575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking302474
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data69.51
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Turion II Neono data
Power efficiency2.4614.63
Architecture codenameGeneva (2010)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,689

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Turion II Neo K625 and Xeon w7-2575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)22 (Docosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data22
Threads244
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data45 MB
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion II Neo K625 and Xeon w7-2575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Neo K625 and Xeon w7-2575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Turion II Neo K625 and Xeon w7-2575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Neo K625 and Xeon w7-2575X are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Neo K625 and Xeon w7-2575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II Neo K625 and Xeon w7-2575X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion II Neo K625 0.39
Xeon w7-2575X 38.66
+9813%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion II Neo K625 618
Xeon w7-2575X 61402
+9836%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.39 38.66
Recency 12 May 2010 24 August 2024
Physical cores 2 22
Threads 2 44
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

Turion II Neo K625 has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-2575X, on the other hand, has a 9812.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and 1000% more physical cores and 2100% more threads.

The Xeon w7-2575X is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II Neo K625 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion II Neo K625 is a notebook processor while Xeon w7-2575X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II Neo K625 and Xeon w7-2575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II Neo K625
Turion II Neo K625
Intel Xeon w7-2575X
Xeon w7-2575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 5 votes

Rate Turion II Neo K625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-2575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II Neo K625 or Xeon w7-2575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.