Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Turion II Neo K625
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 outperforms Turion II Neo K625 by a whopping 5337% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3292 | 360 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Turion II Neo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.99 | 28.87 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Geneva (2010) | Strix Point (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 12 May 2010 (15 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion II Neo K625 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3200 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 233 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Turion II Neo K625 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | S1 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Neo K625 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Neo K625 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Neo K625 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 890M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II Neo K625 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.35 | 19.03 |
| Recency | 12 May 2010 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Turion II Neo K625 has 86.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, on the other hand, has a 5337.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion II Neo K625 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
