Core 2 Duo T7700 vs Turion II N530

Aggregate performance score

Turion II N530
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.54
Core 2 Duo T7700
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.60
+11.1%

Core 2 Duo T7700 outperforms Turion II N530 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion II N530 and Core 2 Duo T7700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28542807
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Turion IIIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency1.461.67
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)2 September 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$307

Detailed specifications

Turion II N530 and Core 2 Duo T7700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache265 KB64 KB
L2 cache2 MB4 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data143 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion II N530 and Core 2 Duo T7700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II N530 and Core 2 Duo T7700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE(1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0no data
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Turion II N530 and Core 2 Duo T7700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II N530 and Core 2 Duo T7700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II N530 and Core 2 Duo T7700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion II N530 0.54
Core 2 Duo T7700 0.60
+11.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion II N530 855
Core 2 Duo T7700 951
+11.2%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion II N530 2245
Core 2 Duo T7700 2554
+13.7%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion II N530 4335
Core 2 Duo T7700 4620
+6.6%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion II N530 2128
+3.4%
Core 2 Duo T7700 2058

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 0.60
Recency 12 May 2010 2 September 2007
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Turion II N530 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo T7700, on the other hand, has a 11.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The Core 2 Duo T7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II N530 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II N530 and Core 2 Duo T7700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II N530
Turion II N530
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
Core 2 Duo T7700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Turion II N530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 82 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II N530 or Core 2 Duo T7700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.