i9-13700HX vs Turion II M540
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Turion II | Raptor Lake-HX |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Caspian (2009) | Raptor Lake |
| Release date | 10 September 2009 (16 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Turion II M540 and Core i9-13700HX: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Turion II M540 and Core i9-13700HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II M540 and Core i9-13700HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| PowerNow | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Turion II M540 has 257% lower power consumption.
i9-13700HX, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Turion II M540 and Intel Core i9-13700HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
