Athlon 64 X2 5600+ vs Turion II M520

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion II M520
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.58
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.60
+3.4%

Athlon 64 X2 5600+ outperforms Turion II M520 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion II M520 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28212806
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Turion IIno data
Power efficiency1.510.61
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)December 2006 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion II M520 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB512K
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data220 mm2
Number of transistorsno data227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion II M520 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-pinAM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II M520 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
PowerNow+-

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 0.60
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 89 Watt

Turion II M520 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 154.3% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 5600+, on the other hand, has a 3.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Turion II M520 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+.

Be aware that Turion II M520 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5600+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II M520 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II M520
Turion II M520
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Athlon 64 X2 5600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 91 vote

Rate Turion II M520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 115 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II M520 or Athlon 64 X2 5600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.