Mobile Sempron M140 vs Turion II M500

Primary details

Comparing Turion II M500 and Mobile Sempron M140 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2847not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Turion IIAMD Mobile Sempron
Power efficiency1.43no data
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Caspian (2009)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)10 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion II M500 and Mobile Sempron M140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz3200 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
Chip lithography45 nm40 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion II M500 and Mobile Sempron M140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-pinS
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II M500 and Mobile Sempron M140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationAMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX
PowerNow+-
VirusProtect-+

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Turion II M500 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Mobile Sempron M140, on the other hand, has a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Turion II M500 and Mobile Sempron M140. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II M500 and Mobile Sempron M140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II M500
Turion II M500
AMD Mobile Sempron M140
Mobile Sempron M140

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 44 votes

Rate Turion II M500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Mobile Sempron M140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II M500 or Mobile Sempron M140, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.