Ultra 9 295HX vs Turion II M500
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3186 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Turion II | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.60 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Caspian (2009) | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) |
| Release date | 10 September 2009 (16 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Turion II M500 and Core Ultra 9 295HX: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Turion II M500 and Core Ultra 9 295HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II M500 and Core Ultra 9 295HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| PowerNow | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 24 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Turion II M500 has 57% lower power consumption.
Ultra 9 295HX, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD Turion II M500 and Intel Core Ultra 9 295HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
