Core 2 Quad Q9500 vs Turion II M500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion II M500
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.49
Core 2 Quad Q9500
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.28
+161%

Core 2 Quad Q9500 outperforms Turion II M500 by a whopping 161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31702519
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Turion IIno data
Power efficiency0.590.57
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)no data
Release date10 September 2009 (16 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Turion II M500 and Core 2 Quad Q9500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2.83 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Bus rate3600 MHz1333 MHz
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cacheno data6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Turion II M500 and Core 2 Quad Q9500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-pinLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II M500 and Core 2 Quad Q9500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

Turion II M500 and Core 2 Quad Q9500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II M500 and Core 2 Quad Q9500 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.49 1.28
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

Turion II M500 has 171.4% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Quad Q9500, on the other hand, has a 161.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion II M500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion II M500 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Quad Q9500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II M500
Turion II M500
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500
Core 2 Quad Q9500

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 50 votes

Rate Turion II M500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 1287 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion II M500 and Core 2 Quad Q9500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.