Apple M3 Max 14-Core vs Turion II M500
Aggregate performance score
M3 Max 14-Core outperforms Turion II M500 by a whopping 4049% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3281 | 380 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Turion II | Apple M3 |
| Power efficiency | 0.60 | 11.23 |
| Designer | AMD | Apple |
| Architecture codename | Caspian (2009) | no data |
| Release date | 10 September 2009 (16 years ago) | 30 October 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Turion II M500 and M3 Max 14-Core: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.748 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4.06 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 3 nm |
| Number of transistors | no data | 92000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Turion II M500 and M3 Max 14-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 78 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II M500 and M3 Max 14-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| PowerNow | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.51 | 21.16 |
| Recency | 10 September 2009 | 30 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 14 |
| Threads | 2 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 78 Watt |
Turion II M500 has 123% lower power consumption.
Apple M3 Max 14-Core, on the other hand, has a 4049% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.
The Apple M3 Max 14-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion II M500 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
