Opteron 3320 EE vs Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Aggregate performance score
Opteron 3320 EE outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-60 by a whopping 161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Opteron 3320 EE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2987 | 2396 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion 64 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.25 | 4.57 |
| Architecture codename | Trinidad/Tyler (2007) | Delhi (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 4 May 2007 (17 years ago) | 4 December 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Opteron 3320 EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 147 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 154 Million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Opteron 3320 EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | S1 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35/31 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Opteron 3320 EE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 90/65 nm, 1.075 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Opteron 3320 EE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Opteron 3320 EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Opteron 3320 EE.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.46 | 1.20 |
| Recency | 4 May 2007 | 4 December 2012 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Opteron 3320 EE has a 160.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.
The Opteron 3320 EE is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 X2 TL-60 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion 64 X2 TL-60 is a notebook processor while Opteron 3320 EE is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
