Celeron 2.10 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Aggregate performance score
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 outperforms Celeron 2.10 by a whopping 200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3213 | 3593 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion 64 | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.21 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Trinidad/Tyler (2007) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| Release date | 4 May 2007 (18 years ago) | November 2002 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Celeron 2.10 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 128 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 147 mm2 | 146 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 154 Million | 55 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Celeron 2.10 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | S1 | 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 MB | 73 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Celeron 2.10. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 90/65 nm, 1.075 | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Celeron 2.10. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.42 | 0.14 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 Watt | 73 Watt |
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 has a 200% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 7200% lower power consumption.
The AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 2.10 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion 64 X2 TL-60 is a notebook processor while Celeron 2.10 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
