A4-1350 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-60

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 X2 TL-60
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42

A4-1350 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-60 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31713069
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion 64AMD A-Series
Power efficiency0.512.75
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameTrinidad/Tyler (2007)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date4 May 2007 (18 years ago)18 October 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A4-1350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Boost clock speed2 GHz1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm32 nm
Die size147 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors154 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A4-1350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1FT3
Power consumption (TDP)35/31 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A4-1350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions90/65 nm, 1.07586x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A4-1350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A4-1350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8210 (300 MHz)

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 0.52
Recency 4 May 2007 18 October 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 8 Watt

A4-1350 has a 23.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 337.5% lower power consumption.

The AMD A4-1350 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Turion 64 X2 TL-60
AMD A4-1350
A4-1350

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 113 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 8 votes

Rate A4-1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A4-1350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.